Cellular


AT&T is testing its new 3G MicroCell service in select markets. The 3G MicroCell allows one to have a 3G access point in their home. This should yield 5-bar coverage in places where AT&T’s coverage is spotty. The device requires a broadband connection of some sort and will support up to 4 simultaneous phones.

According to TUAW, the device is rumored to retail for about $150 and there will be no monthly subscription charges.

There has been no shortage of complaints about AT&T’s wireless service lately. Perhaps this is AT&T’s answer to those problems. Too bad it will cost AT&T customers more money and only benefit them when they are near their 3G access point.

via The Unofficial Apple Weblog

T-Mobile would have been better served by holding off on announcements for a couple weeks. Lately, its been all iPhone all the time and there is little anyone can do to get people to line up outside of their stores short of giving iPhones away for free. Nonetheless, T-Mobile’s new cellular/Wi-Fi service Hotspot @Home, is kind of a big deal.

For an introductory rate of $10 per month, T-Mobile customers with one of T-Mobile’s hotspot ready and a wireless broadband connection at home can ditch their land line (or VoIP) phone. The phone will work seamlessly on either the Wi-Fi or cellular network so calls that start on either network can continue on the other. Wi-Fi minutes are unlimited and free regardless of what hotspot is used. As a bonus, all of T-Mobile’s hotspots are free for phone calls with this plan.

For many people this could be a great deal. Anyone who maintains a phone at home because cellular coverage is poor or nonexistent in their abode will be a natural for this. People that spend a fair amount of their time within range of some sort of Wi-Fi will also find this useful. As the article referenced below points out, globetrotters could also get big savings over international roaming charges with this service.

Hotspot @Home can be added to any qualifying T-Mobile plan. Qualifying appears to mean any plan that costs $39.99 or more per month. If you don’t have a wireless router at home, T-Mobile will set you up with one almost for free (rebate involved). There are only a few hotspot ready phone models available from T-Mobile at this time, but that is likely to change.

This is certainly not an iPhone killer. Cingular, however, could learn something here. If they don’t already have something like this in the works, they should. The iPhone already moves from cellular networks to Wi-Fi for data connections, it does not seem like that much of a stretch to do the same for voice.

via The New York Times

Podlinez will play the most recent episode of any podcast on any phone. Each podcast is assigned a phone number. When it is dialed, the podcast starts playing after a short announcement. Nice work, if anyone from Podlinez happens to be reading, here are a few unsolicited feature requests:

  • A searchable directory. 15 pages of podcasts are a lot to sort through. One should not have to enter the full feed URL of the podcast on the home page to see if it is already listed either.
  • A mobile accessible directory. Podlinz will really shine when one has some time to kill while not near a computer. An optimized site for mobile browsers, some form of search that uses SMS or even a audio directory would be great.
  • Keep more than just the last episode of a podcast on hand.

Good luck!

via Lifehacker

Bluephone, a new service from BT, will allow a user to make Voice over IP calls with bluetooth while at home or otherwise in the presence of a bluetooth base station. When they are not near a base station, the phone will switch over to the GSM cellular network. All of this is going to work seamlessly and be totally transparent to the user of course (I’m only being a slightly sarcastic here). Motorola and NEC appear to be working on the same sort of thing using Wi-fi instead of bluetooth.

via Gizmodo and Gizmodo

Gizmodo is pointing to a study that states that drivers who admit to using cell phones while driving are more apt to be distracted even when they are not using their mobile. This seems to indicate that there is some sort of “distracted-driver personality”. Not a big surprise.

Here is an excerpt:

When compared to drivers who do not talk on cell phones, drivers who use cell phones are 56% more likely to be distracted behind the wheel while thinking about what to eat; 36% more likely to be distracted thinking about relationship issues; 32% more likely to be distracted when thinking about their jobs; 27% more likely to be distracted when thinking about health concerns; 21% more likely to be distracted when thinking about family issues, and 19% more likely to be distracted when thinking about money issues or bills.

I’m thinking that when asked at least 90% of these people would clasify themselves as “Excellent Multi-taskers”, then be distracted by thoughts of food, relationships or money before you could ask another question.

Previous rant on cellphone usage while driving: Tele-taxi

After being involved in a taxi collision due in part to the driver paying more attention to his phone conversation than the street, I tried to remember the last time I jumped in a taxi where the driver wasn’t jabbering on the phone, I couldn’t. Luckily this was a minor crash, the cab seemed to be the only thing damaged after plowing into the back of a stopped car, but it could have been much worse. In a city where cars, trucks, bicycles and pedestrians are all competing for limited amounts of pavement, I think the “professional” drivers should refrain from the sorts of extended conversations they always seem to be involved in when I am the passenger. As a matter of fact, all drivers would probably be advised to do the same.

taxiA study by the National Safety Counsel demonstrated that people having a conversation on a cell phone “missed twice as many simulated traffic signals as when they were not talking on the cell phone” and “took longer to react to those signals that they did detect”. This study also proved that there was almost no difference between using a hands free phone or holding the phone. This is quite interesting since it seems that all the legislation that has been enacted in this area revolves around holding the phone, hands free devices are normally considered lawful. In light of this evidence, I wonder if it actually should be against the law to talk on a mobile phone regardless of how you actually do it.

I’m no fan of over legislating things, but given the evidence of studies like the one mentioned before, should there be an outright ban on phone use by cabbies? I noticed that the taxicab rider’s bill of rights did not mention anything about this, although, you do have the right to incense free air. One cabbie that I mentioned my concerns to told me that the next time I got in a cab and the guy was using the phone, tell him to shut it off. I have not tried this yet, but I am thinking that the only outcome will be me looking for another cab after liberal amounts of shouting.

While we’re banning things, should this behavior be banned for the general public as well. Cars don’t just hit other cars and immovable objects. In congested areas they have a pretty good chance of hitting something less crash resistant than a car. Perhaps legislation should only effect drivers while they are in congested areas. After all, I think it is probably fairly safe to use your phone when you are on the open highway, it certainly seems safer than when you are in a city. Highway travel generally requires less reactionary type behavior than city driving, so I would say that the chances of talking on the phone when something happens that you must react to quickly are certainly much lower on the highway.

This also makes me wonder why people seem to be so much more distracted when talking on a phone than when talking to people that are sitting in the car with them. Think about it, most automobiles have more than just a driver’s seat, and sometimes there are actually others riding with the driver, many times they actually talk to each other. Has anyone done a study on collisions that might have been prevented if the driver and passenger had not been carrying on a conversation? Maybe talking while the vehicle is in motion should be prohibited as well. Perhaps it isn’t as much of an issue since when conversations take place among people in cars, all of the occupants are in the same situation. They all have some skin in the game so to speak. They know that distracting the driver enough might land them in the hospital. Cell phone conversations aren’t really the same thing. Unless of course both participants are in the same vehicle, but that’s another story altogether. The person at the other end of the phone generally has no idea about the current driving conditions so they really are in to position to say “Look out!” or “Watch the road!” or “You’re a crappy driver!”.

So, what to do about these talkative taxicab drivers? Maybe the next time I am in the back of a cab and the driver is arguing with his girlfriend, I’ll kindly tell him to hang up the phone. After he dumps me on the side of the road, I can lodge a complaint with the TLC. All joking aside, if you have been involved in some sort of incident in a NYC taxi that you feel should be reported, by all means let the TLC know about it, you can even use their online complaint form.